Japanese crossword «Woodpecker»
| Size: 20x20 | Picture: | Difficulty: | Added: | 15.01.15 |
COMMENTS
Whatever this is, it's not worth the effort. For a 3 star difficulty puzzle, it has 5 star trick to discover or you'll be stuck forever. There literally is a single spot you have to find before you can continue. There's no alternate path. If you're going to make me angry by getting me to think I can't solve a 3 star difficulty puzzle, the picture should at least not suck.
replyshow: 3 🗨
Do not care about the star rating. IMO, It is not reliable.
replyThen get good. If you don't like to think then don't make puzzles.
replyI would rate it "very difficult". I don't care how the picture looks though.
replyI did find it fairly easy to be fair even if I was stuck a short time. Although I usually try to find the most difficult small puzzles so might just got used to the tricks now.
I agree though you need to find certain spots that help you advance although I think that is part of the fun at smaller puzzles.
replyI agree though you need to find certain spots that help you advance although I think that is part of the fun at smaller puzzles.
Difficult for me. Solved in about 1h20 (no hint, no guess).
I had to rely on "recursion" for 2 zones.
Nice difficulty, thanks!
replyI had to rely on "recursion" for 2 zones.
Nice difficulty, thanks!
I felt like I was going to need to grab a hint several times but I persevered, I think it was a great challenge.
replyNo less than 4 stars. I was about to give up but proud that I persevered.
replySure you have to find specific spots to advance, but in a 20x20 puzzle, that's very doable. It's a pretty limited set of options. I thought this was really fun; I love smaller puzzles that are tricky. And the picture is cute too, I could see what it was right away :)
replyhalf-hour of good fun. There's a trick, I was so going to give in and guess, but than I pulled myself together and resisted, and it was worth it. Thanks creator
replyI found the star difficulty rating is not reliable, so I do not care about it.
replyThis one was ok. Didn't felt it too difficult or challenging. Maybe I was just lucky to find the right way quickly.
replyI don't get the rating, nor why there are so many people complaining. Took me 15 min, no hints/guesses, and it didn't even need advanced logics.
If you practice a lot on hard ones, this one should be pretty easy. 3 stars max.
replyIf you practice a lot on hard ones, this one should be pretty easy. 3 stars max.
yes, the harder puzzles get narrow for a long time, just one logical move at a time. nice challenge, thanks.
replyspoiler
What do you call a procrastinating woodpecker?
A wouldpecker
A wouldpecker
show: 2 🗨
show: 1 🗨
took me 45 minutes in between work lol but I didnt think I would be able to do it tbh
replyGiven the difficulty (for this size), the picture is underwhelming.
replyThis was surprisingly engaging. It felt like it unfolded exactly as it should, and I wasn't scanning like a maniac to find the next step. Or according to the first guy, maybe I just got lucky by finding it quickly? Either way, it made me bust out pretty much every logic move I have in the arsenal. Very fun.
reply
